I appreciate all the conversation and discussion going on about Tribulus, but I want to make a clarification post because I fear that this conversation may make things even more confusing for people reading.
Tribulus Aquaticus is completely different than Tribulus Terrestris.
This is a confusing case of where two herbs have similar names and it leads people to thinking that they are closely related, but where they really have little, if anything, to do with one another.
Instead of quote entire posts, I'm going to quote just a couple of things to reply to out of the conversations pertaining to the comparisons of Prime XT to Tribulus Terrestris.
@Mixelflick wrote - I'm a little shocked at the dosage - a whopping 4.8 GRAMS/day!? I thought 3 grams/day of Tribestan was a lot, LOL.
^^^ The dosage suggested is based off of the dosage that people commonly used and saw results with for this ingredient.
@dacookie wrote - Anyone can comment who really likes bulgarian tribulus usually and compare it to this stuff?
^^^ If there is someone that likes both, they are of course welcome to comment, but it would be a personal opinion comparison because Tribulus Aquaticus is completely different in the way its proposed to work, results, etc. (Just wanted to clarify that bc I didn't want anyone reading getting confused).
@Mixelflick wrote - TO CLARIFY: People should be dosing Prime XT as per the company's guidelines. Pinching pennies will not yield an accurate representation of what it can do (and rarely does). Especially when dealing with high end herbal extracts.
^^^ thank you. Very true statement. In the industry we see that all the time, people saying _ thing doesn't do ___, when the reality is that they just aren't taking the dosage that does. I always look at it, especially with herbal extracts, that sometimes saving a dollar or two isn't really saving anything if it causes me not to get the benefits from the ingredient/product.